JERUSALEM — Amid the global controversy over President Donald Trump’s recognition last week of Jerusalem as the capital of the Jewish state, Israeli and Palestinian leaders actually found rare consensus: They agreed that the development was a win for Israel and a loss for the Palestinians.
To be sure, Trump’s concession was not a major one. Israel was always expected to get a recognized capital in Jerusalem under any Middle East peace deal, and the president did not reject Palestinian claims to have their capital in the city, too.
However, the change in two decades of American policy on Jerusalem cemented the impression on both sides that the US was tilting toward Israel. With Trump’s team working on a peace deal, Israeli and Palestinian leaders debated how his decision would affect the effort.
The Israelis said their country still wants peace and Trump was only recognizing the obvious: Israel already controls all of Jerusalem, has treated it as its capital for 69 years and was never going to settle for anything less than an acknowledgement that Jerusalem is its capital.
Whether the Palestinians can also claim parts of Jerusalem as their capital remains an open question, but that was always one of the so-called “final-status issues” at the heart of negotiations.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Sunday, Dec. 10, during a visit with French President Emanuel Macron, that Jerusalem was as much Israel’s capital as Paris was France’s, and that recognition of this fact was necessary for peace.
“I think that what peace requires is to be built on the foundation of truth, on the facts of the past and on the present,” Netanyahu said. “This is the only way that you can build a pluralistic and successful future.”
More important, Israeli leaders contended, Trump gave the Palestinians a long overdue reality check. They said the president showed that he would not indulge the Palestinians’ attempts to deny Israel’s existence.
Netanyahu made that equation explicit in a meeting Monday with European foreign ministers in Brussels.
He likened the Palestinians’ opposition to recognizing Jerusalem as Israel’s capital with their refusal to accept the existence of a Jewish state, which he has long maintained was the primary obstacle to peace.
“I think we should give peace a chance. I think we should see what is presented and see if we can advance this peace. But if we have to begin it, I would say it’s one place: Recognize the Jewish state,” he said Monday morning in Brussels.
“It’s always been about the Jewish state. And it’s time that the Palestinians recognize the Jewish state and also recognize the fact that it has a capital. It’s called Jerusalem.”
Palestinian leaders accused Israel of having no interest in making peace on terms they could ever accept. By giving Israel something it wants for free, they suggested, Trump signaled that he would not even try to oppose its continued settlement of eastern Jerusalem and the West Bank, which they said has made nearly impossible the creation of the state the Palestinians demand as part of a peace deal.
In an op-ed Dec. 7 in The New York Times, Hanan Ashrawi, a Palestinian lawmaker and a member of the PLO’s executive committee, said Trump may have “finally put to rest the dream of a two-state solution, which has been on life support for years already.”
“By rewarding its claim on Jerusalem with official recognition, Mr. Trump is giving Israel a free hand to accelerate its policies of creeping annexation of the occupied Palestinian territories and its deliberate attempts to erase the Palestinians’ historical, political, cultural and demographic presence in historic Palestine,” she wrote.
Saeb Erekat, the PA’s chief peace negotiator, on Dec. 6 for the first time endorsed giving up on a separate Palestinian state and instead pushing for a bi-national state shared by Jews and Arabs — an outcome unthinkable to most Israelis.
“Now is the time to transform the struggle for one state with equal rights for everyone living in historic Palestine,” Erekat told Haaretz.
At the same time, Palestinian leaders said Trump’s recognition of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel showed once and for all that the US was not an honest broker for peace. PA President Mahmoud Abbas said in a statement last week that the US was no longer fit to oversee the peace process.
The next day, Abbas’ diplomatic affairs adviser confirmed that the president canceled plans to meet with Vice President Mike Pence this month in Ramallah, the PA’s de facto capital in the West Bank, because of the announcement on Jerusalem.
“There will not be a meeting with Pence. The matter is bigger than a mere meeting because the US, in its decisions on Jerusalem, crossed red lines,” Majdi al-Khalidi told the PA radio station.
Palestinian leaders warned that with the two-state solution no longer viable, their people would turn to violence.
The PA urged protests, and the Palestinian terrorist group Hamas called for a new intifada, or uprising — granted, a call they make habitually. A series of rockets was launched at southern Israel from Gaza, where Hamas governs.
However, by Tuesday, the status quo seemed to remain in effect.
To ease pressure on Trump over his Jerusalem announcement, Netanyahu quietly delayed the final votes, slated for this week, on a bill that would make it harder for Israel to hand over any part of the city under a future peace deal, Israel’s Hadashot TV news reported Dec. 9.
Pleased but not ecstatic over Trump’s decision, Israelis continued their daily routines.
In eastern Jerusalem, Gaza and the West Bank, a wave of Palestinian demonstrations petered out and schools and businesses that had closed reopened.
Abbas’ foreign affairs adviser on Sunday clarified to the Times of Israel that the Palestinians had no plans to cut ties with the US.
“We are not cutting our relationship with America. We are protesting the move of Mr. Trump,” Nabil Shaath said. “We think Mr. Trump has acted in a way that makes it impossible for the US to act as an honest broker. We are just expressing that.”
Meanwhile, the world awaits Trump’s plan for what he branded as the “ultimate deal” between Israel and the Palestinians.