JERUSALEM — President Donald Trump said Israel will have to pay a “high price” in peace negotiations with the Palestinians over the move of the US Embassy to Jerusalem, raising consternation in the Jewish state.
On Aug. 21, addressing supporters at a rally in West Virginia, Trump praised himself for moving the US Embassy to Jerusalem from Tel Aviv, saying it “should have been done years ago.” He said it would help facilitate a peace deal between Israel and the Palestinians because it took the issue of Jerusalem “off the table.”
“In the negotiation Israel will have to pay a higher price because they won a very big thing, but I took it off the table,” he said.
The Palestinians “could never get past the fact of Jerusalem becoming the capital, but they will get something very good next because it’s their turn next.”
Amid the concerns in Jerusalem over the remarks, National Security Adviser John Bolton, who is here for discussions related to Iran, qualified his boss’ remarks.
Speaking to reporters at the King David Hotel on Aug. 22, he denied that that the embassy move was part of a “quid pro quo,” stating that “as a deal-maker, as a bargainer, he would expect, you would expect, I would expect that the Palestinians would say, ‘OK, great, so we didn’t get that one and now we want something else. And we’ll see how it goes.’”
However, he added that “the fundamental point is that ultimately this is something that the parties are going to have to agree on . . . they’ll decide between themselves what the price of that, if anything, was.”
Responding to Trump, Israeli Agriculture Minister Uri Ariel told Army Radio that “this isn’t a terrible morning, but there is cause for concern regarding Trump.”
Regional Cooperation Minister Tzachi Hanegbi took pains to reassure Israelis, asserting that the US leader “has not turned on us.”
“And I can say as someone who has intensive contacts with the White House — I was there only three weeks ago — that he will not turn on us,” he said.
Such reassurances follow months of euphoria following the embassy move and general relief on the Israeli right that Trump shares its views.
Following the 2016 election, Education Minister Naftali Bennett famously boasted that “the era of the Palestinian state is over.”
Politicians on the left were more welcoming of Trump’s remarks. Knesset member Amir Peretz, a former defense minister, was quoted by the Jerusalem Post as saying that “when dealing with a president who thinks like a businessman, it was clear it would only be a matter of time until he asked for something in return.
“No one can claim that this is a hostile president with demands that are not legitimate. Netanyahu cannot deny the need to make courageous decisions.
“Solving the dispute and dividing the land into two states for two peoples is not a deal with the US but an Israeli interest that will allow our state to remain both Jewish and democratic.”
According to Ynet, the PLO harshly denounced Trump’s remarks, saying they indicated “the continuation of a biased policy in Israel’s favor, and the continued illusion of the American administration that it is possible to achieve the ‘deal of the century’ without Jerusalem as the capital of a Palestinian state.”
Hamas likewise spoke out against the president, stating that his “declarations, according to which Jerusalem is off the negotiation table, are audacious and dangerous and the right response would be to cancel the PA’s recognition of the State of Israel, and cease all security coordination with Israel.
“The authority should also break all contacts, including security contacts, with the American administration.”
Speaking with the Times of Israel, Majdi al-Khaldi, a senior adviser to PA President Mahmoud Abbas, said that “the American administration made a major mistake when it recognized Jerusalem as Israel’s capital and moved its embassy there.”
“There is no compensation the administration could offer for those moves other than recognizing the State of Palestine with East Jerusalem as its capital and clearly defining the two-state solution as the sole solution.”
The Trump administration has yet to reveal its much-touted Middle East peace plan, which is being developed by Jared Kushner, his son-in-law and senior adviser; Jason Greenblatt, a special representative for international negotiations; David Friedman, the US ambassador to Israel; and Nikki Haley, the US envoy to the UN.
The team released a joint statement earlier this month, saying that “no one will be fully pleased with our proposal, but that’s the way it must be if real peace is to be achieved. Peace can only succeed if it is based on realities.”
It is possible that Trump’s latest statement was intended to bring the Palestinians to the table following PA President Mahmoud Abbas’ statement that he would not consider the Americans’ proposals.
“We were the first to fight against it and we will continue to fight against it until it falls,” Abbas said of the administration’s plan last week during a session of the PLO Central Council. “This is the ‘slap of the century.’”
This isn’t the first time Trump has made such comments. Earlier this year, he suggested that if the Palestinians return to talks, his decision on Jerusalem would mean that it’s now Israel’s turn to give up something to keep the Palestinians in.
“You win one point,” Trump said to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu during the World Economic Forum in Davos in January, “and you’ll give up some points later on in the negotiation if it ever takes place. I don’t know that it ever will take place.”
Later, Trump said, “Israel will pay for that,” referring to Jerusalem.