WASHINGTON Critics have a simple message for Israels top diplomat and the Obama administrations envoy on anti-Semitism: Reread your job descriptions.
Every Israeli ambassador to Washington launches his tenure by assembling the Israeli and Jewish press and listing what he sees as his priorities: High among them, always, is outreach to US Jews.
But, less than a year into his tenure, Ambassador Michael Oren who started his job with a speech stressing that priority is being criticized by some left-wing organizations, such as Americans for Peace now and Ameinu, for saying that the lobbying group J Street was fooling around with the lives of seven million people.
The position of US Special Envoy to Combat and Monitor Anti-Semitism is a more recent invention, but its mandate is self-evident: Defend Jews, everywhere. But Hannah Rosenthals first media foray in her new role as envoy took the shape of an attack on Oren, a fellow diplomat.
In a Dec. 24 interview, Rosenthal told Ha’aretz that it was most unfortunate that Oren had accused J Street, the left-wing pro-Israel group, of endangering Israel.
Her comments prompted a sharp rebuke from Alan Solow, a longtime Obama backer and chairman of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations.
The flap was the latest revelation of fissures between the Obama administration (backed by some left-wing Jewish groups) on the one hand, and Israel and its establishment US Jewish defenders on the other.
The sniping is in abeyance for now: Rosenthal told JTA she is focused on combating what she sees as increasing anti-Semitism in Europe and the Arab world, and would prefer not to go over the recent back and forth.
Oren is in Israel and his embassy staff did not return requests for comment.
Solow, a staunch defender of Oren and Rosenthals most prominent critic, says he, too, sees the matter as now resolved.
IN his initial, formal statement, Solow had said that some people were suggesting that Rosenthals comments could threaten to limit her effectiveness in the area for which she is actually responsible.
But in his subsequent interview with JTA this week, Solow denied that he had been calling for Rosenthals professional head.
Rosenthal, without prompting, had almost the same message about keeping focused on her mandate.
Its very important that people gather to talk about the anti-Semitism theyre fearing, she said. Thats my job monitoring but my job also says combating. Its important to expand the conversation to talk to other ethnic and religious groups.
At the same time, Rosenthal was unapologetic about her comments on Orens slam of J Street an organization she helped guide as a board member until her appointment last month to the government job.
The reporter asked me about Orens comments, and I said that saying J Street threatens seven million Jews was most unfortunate, she said.
Rosenthal said that she was untroubled that in the wake of her interview Jeffrey Feltman, an assistant secretary of state, issued a statement praising Oren for his role in maintaining and strengthening [the Israeli-US] relationship through his day-to-day interaction with the administration and Congress on issues of vital importance to both countries and his vigorous outreach to Americans of all origins and points of view.
The release of the Feltman statement was in itself unusual: It went out to two publications, Ha’aretz and Politico, and while officials at both the State Department and the White House confirmed its content to JTA, neither would provide the entire statement.
IN her Ha’aretz interview, Rosenthal also veered off the topic of anti-Semitism to discuss Israels peace prospects, and she repeated the Obama administrations mantra about urgent engagement. Her discussion of that subject raised as many official Jewish eyebrows behind the scenes as did her comments about Oren.
Rosenthal said Mideast peace issues are not unrelated to anti-Semitism, because one must know how to separate legitimate criticism of Israel from anti-Semitism.
Solow said he would continue to defend Oren because he was confident there was a consensus among the Conference of Presidents 50-plus member organizations that that Oren was making strides in improving US-Israel relations, and that it was inappropriate for Rosenthal, an Obama administration official, to criticize him.
Solow also said the Conference of Presidents did not have a view on Orens criticisms of J Street. Oren made his most recent anti-J Street remark to a conference of leaders of the United Synagogue of Conservative Judaism.
Behind the scenes, leaders of many Jewish organizations see J Street as fair game: Soon after it was created nearly two years ago, J Street drew attention by lobbing rhetorical bombs at establishment Jewish groups and figures, accusing them of impeding peace by withholding support for vigorous US engagement in the Middle East.
J Street, whose officials were unavailable for comment on this story due to the holiday break, more recently has largely refrained from sharp attacks on other groups.
The flap over Rosenthal and Orens comments appears to be part of a larger battle between the Jewish establishment, which still seeks the marginalization of J Street for its views on Israel, and the Democratic establishment, which embraces J Streets pro-Obama approach to engagement.
One of the jarring aspects of this debate is that the sparring is coming from two figures not known for fighting. Prior to his appointment, Oren had a reputation as an affable scholar.
In 2004, at a State Department conference on Israels intentions in its deadly attack during the 1967 Six Day War on the USS Liberty, he refused to be baited into name-calling by those who insisted that Israel was targeting the ship and stuck to his prodigious research.
And, early on, after his appointment to the Washington Post, Oren spoke of the need to reach out to US Jewish groups that are critical of his governments policies but are committed to Israels existence as a Jewish state.
Rosenthal, who served for years as the director of the Jewish Council for Public Affairs, was known as a consensus-builder for an umbrella group whose bottom line is consensus.
Perhaps not any longer. Asked if she was ready to put this behind her, she said yes, but added: I dont forget anything.