
They, like other pro-Israel activists there, were overwhelmed by the anti-Israel and anti-Semitic hostility that greeted them.
So when the follow-up to Durban came to Geneva last week in the form of Durban II, the union was better prepared.
They came en masse with some 150 Jewish students from about 30 European countries constituting more than one-tenth of all activists accredited to the Durban Review Conference.
Throughout the week, they advocated for Israel.
We wanted to be sure that if something happened here like in Durban, wed be ready to respond, said Jonas Karpantschof, the Danish chairman of the student union.
The European Union of Jewish Students was just one component of an enormous Jewish presence in Geneva last week that drew a lot of attention from competing activists, UN staff and the media.
Jewish groups hosted or participated in daily pro-Israel or pro-human rights events outside the UN grounds, organized anti-discrimination panels inside the UN and brought in some of the heaviest hitters in pro-Israel advocacy: Nobel laureate Elie Wiesel, attorney Alan Dershowitz, Canadian parliamentarian Irwin Cotler, French intellectual Bernard-Henri Levy, actor Jon Voight and Father Patrick Desbois, among others.
If the promise of Never Again is going to mean anything, youre going to have apply action to that phrase, said Roz Rothstein, founder and CEO of StandWithUs, which co-organized a pro-Israel, pro-human rights demonstration whose message was The UN remains silent.
The rally was covered on CNN and the BBC.
On April 20, Wiesel and Dershowitz joined members of the European Union of Jewish Students when they tried to confront Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad before his speech at the UN forum, in which he described Israel as racist perpetrators of genocide.
During the speech, several of the Jewish students shouted Racist! from the upper gallery before guards hustled them out.
One French Jewish student with a rainbow wig who was not from the union made headlines around the world when he rushed Ahmadinejad during the speech and hurled a red rubber nose at him.
On April 21, the student union joined with Darfuri groups outside the UN building to protest the genocide in Sudan and highlight other human rights abuses, such as Irans treatment of the Bahai and homosexuals.
We couldnt stay silent when theres so much hatred, discrimination and racism in the world that the UN doesnt want to deal with, said Lili Dardashti, the student unions Swiss director.
The only other group as highly visible as the pro-Israel advocates were Iranians.
In 2001, anti-Israel forces overplayed their hand at Durban, producing a screed so toxic that even the UN high commissioner for human rights rejected it.
This time, pro-Israel advocates had a strong showing though at least one Jewish critic of Israel said the pro-occupation lobby overplayed its hand.
The charge of anti-Semitism is lethal, for good reason but only if its fair, said Cecilie Surasky, communications director for Jewish Voice for Peace.
The problem is that to them, any criticism of Israel becomes not only anti-Semitic but almost Nazism, which not only turns off any reasonable person, it also fuels anti-Semitism.
The director of international relations for the Simon Wiesenthal Center, Shimon Samuels, said fear of sparking conspiracy theories about Jewish power is no reason to stay silent.
If we dont speak up, therell be more Israel bashing and anti-Semitic insinuation, Samuels said. If we do, its the Jewish lobby and Jewish conspiracies.
Aside from the noise outside UN headquarters in Geneva, groups such as the International Jewish Caucus held more discreet meetings with top-level diplomats to press their case against singling out Israel for condemnation.
Bnai Brith International brought a contingent of 50, hailing from Romania to Uruguay, to meet with ambassadors from places like Mexico, Germany and France, delegation head Richard Heideman said.
We had to be here because Durban I was such a hate fest, said Heideman, who was among those who led the Jewish walkout from Durban eight years ago.
This time there was no reason for us to leave. Quite the contrary: We tried to impact the delegations with the wide human-rights agenda that transcends the Israel-Palestinian conflict so many countries tried to make a focus here.
Ultimately, Jewish groups condemned the final draft declaration of the conference, which upheld the conclusions of the 2001 Durban conference, enshrining a paragraph that singles out Israel by including the Palestinians in a section titled Victims of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance.
Still, the pressure before and during the conference made an impression, according to Michael Schneider, secretary-general of the World Jewish Congress.
Before the conference, the WJC met with 17 ambassadors, making the somewhat difficult case for why countries should boycott what appeared to be the most important anti-racism event on the human-rights calendar just because of a solitary, Palestinian-related paragraph.
Once the conference started, Schneider said, Ahmadinejad helped make the case for them.
His speech was a tremendous boost in our efforts, showing the UN conference for what it is a mockery, he said.
Search the IJN using the term Durban, and find all of our stories on the UN conference. Related commentary is on our blog, Rocky Mountain Jew.


