Intermountain Jewish News

Sep 02nd

Abbas and Kerry, partners in purblindness

E-mail Print PDF

With his customary grace and bigheartedness, Mahmoud Abbas, now in his ninth (or it is tenth?) year of his four-year term as president of the Palestinian Authority, told the PLO’s Central Council April 26 that he will never recognize Israel as a Jewish state.

The PLO recognized Israel as a state in 1993, he said, and should not have to accept its religious identity. Neither Egypt nor Jordan was required to recognize Israel’s Jewish character when they signed peace treaties with Israel, so why should the Palestinians? he asked rhetorically.

Here’s why: Neither Egypt nor Jordan demanded that Israel grant citizenship to some five million Palestinians living outside of Israel and the West Bank. Neither Egypt nor Jordan demanded a “right of return.” Neither Egypt nor Jordan claimed that multigeneration descendants of Arabs in 1948 (who didn’t consider or call themselves Palestinians at that time), who left Palestine in the war against the nascent State of Israel initiated by the Arabs, have an inalienable right to return to Palestine. Neither Egypt nor Jordan sought to reverse history by demanding that the State of Israel commit suicide by importing millions of Palestinians who never lived there.

Mahmoud Abbas, president of the PA, however, demands a Palestinian “right of return,” that is, the right to destroy the Jewish state of Israel. That is why he, but neither Egypt nor Jordan, is required to recognize the Jewish character of Israel. In fact, the entire issue of recognition of Israel as a Jewish state only arose when the Palestinians demanded a “right of return.” Neither Egypt nor Jordan raised the issue, which is why the Jewish character of Israel was not raised by Israel in its bilateral negotiations with Egypt and Jordan.

Read related IJN blog posting, "Your views on recognizing Israel’s Jewish identity"

In sum, Israel’s demand for Palestinian recognition of Israel as a Jewish state came in response to the Palestinian demand for a Palestinian “right of return.” The shoe is on Abbas’ foot. Don’t expect him to recognize this. On the idea of a permanent peace with a Jewish state, Abbas is purblind.

Likewise, Secretary of State John Kerry, in an equally dangerous way.

He told the Daily Beast, “A two-state solution will be clearly underscored as the only real alternative because a unitary state winds up either being an apartheid state with second-class citizens or it ends up being a state that destroys the capacity of Israel to be a Jewish state.”

Apartheid? As in Israel, by policy and choice, denying Arabs under its jurisdiction the right to vote? the right to Israeli tax monies? the right to live where they wish? the right to travel where they wish? the right to emigrate? the right to recourse to the courts?

Sorry, Mr. Secretary, even under a worse-case scenario of a “unitary state,” it would bear no relation to the apartheid state of South Africa. Shame on you for joining Jimmy Carter, among others, in contributing to the international delegitimation of Israel. Your own purblindness matches Abbas’.

Not to mention, Israel wants a two-state solution. Israel offered the Palestinians a two-state solution in 2000 at Camp David and again in 2008. Both times, the Palestinians rejected it.

And, let us be perfectly clear, the Palestinians were offered it in the recently suspended negotiations of 2013 and 2014, too; but they, not Israel, rejected it.

How so? Was it not Israel who refused to release another 26 Palestinian prisoners on March 29, as previously agreed? Was it not Israel that set in motion the diplomatic tit-for-tat that led to the current impasse?

Actually, not. As follows:

When Israel and the Palestinians agreed to negotiate last year, the Palestinians were required to make no concession and no gesture to Israel. Israel, on the other hand, was required to release Palestinians murderers — in return for what? For a meaningful negotiation. But they didn’t get it. They got, instead, the Palestinians insistence, among other things, on a “right of return” (see above) — which would mean the end of the Jewish state of Israel.

Here you have it: Palestinian genius, not at building its own economy, not at building a state, not at improving its own lot, but at public relations. The PA first gets Israel to release Palestinians murderers — a concrete gain for the PA — while offering Israel no concrete gain in return. Then, when Israel wisely wakes up and says to itself: Why release more prisoners when the PA has made it perfectly clear it will never agree to a Jewish state, nor even regard a peace treaty with Israel as an “end the conflict” and “final settlement of all claims”? But, in return for Israel’s quite rational refusal go move forward on a “peace” process that didn’t promise peace, Kerry and President Obama administration choose to blame “both sides.”

Kerry was simply outraged that Israel insisted on the Palestinian recognition of Israel as a Jewish state —it scuttled his much coddled negotiations, which pundits around the word said from the beginning were doomed, given the Palestinian refusal to move off square one: its abhorrence, not of openly declared Islamic states, but of a single Jewish state.

Copyright © 2014 by the Intermountain Jewish News


IJN e-Edition

This is only a taste! Get full access to the IJN via our e-Edition, only $14.04 for IJN Print subscribers.

E-Edition subscribers get access to a complete digital replica of the IJN, which includes all special sections.

Get the IJN's free newsletter!

Shabbat Times

JTA News

Police ends search for terrorist infiltrator in central Israel

Marcy Oster Police set up roadblocks in central Israel following intelligence information that a Palestinian terrorist may have infiltrated Israel near Netanya. ... [Link]

Blockers and tacklers: Jewish gridders gearing up for NFL campaign

mbrodsky Blocking brothers and fullback who hasn’t had a carry in four seasons are among the Jewish players on NFL rosters as the league kicks off this week. ... [Link]

Report: SodaStream mulling departure from West Bank plant

Marcy Oster The Israeli firm SodaStream, which has been a target of the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement, is considering closing its West Bank factory. ... [Link]

Canadian Nazi Party founder running for Ontario township post

Marcy Oster The founder of the Canadian Nazi Party, John Beattie, is running for deputy head of the town council in an Ontario community. ... [Link]

Foreign Affairs Committee’s Royce and Engel to visit Israel

Marcy Oster Reps. Ed Royce and Eliot Engel of the House Foreign Affairs Committee will visit Israel this week. ... [Link]

Turkish Jews can stay mum on Israel’s Gaza op, Turkish Jewish intellectuals say

Marcy Oster Jewish citizens of Turkey are under no obligation to comment on Israel’s operation in Gaza, a group of Jewish intellectuals in Turkey said in an open letter. ... [Link]

U.S. calls on Israel to reverse land appropriation

Marcy Oster The United States called on Israel to cancel the government appropriation of West Bank land in the Etzion bloc, while Israeli ministers praised and panned the decision. ... [Link]

Artists in Brazilian exhibition protest Israeli funding

Marcy Oster Most of the artists participating in a major Brazilian art event protested funding for the show from the Israeli government. ... [Link]

Intermountain Jewish News • 1177 Grant Street • Denver, CO 80203 • 303 861 2234 • FAX 303 832 6942 • •