Intermountain Jewish News

Banner
Saturday,
Mar 13th
    Yom Shabbat, 27 AdarI 5770

Who favors a Palestinian state? No one, really

E-mail Print PDF

On the face of it, Obama is liberal, Netanyahu is conservative, and the explosion is only waiting to happen.

Variation: The European Union wants a Palestinian state, Netanyahu doesn’t, and the explosion is already here.

Variation: The Palestinians have captured the PR high ground, claiming they want and deserve their own state; Netanyahu says no, and Israel loses out in public opinion.

Variation: Outgoing Prime Minister Ehud Olmert worked hard to negotiate a Palestinian state, and won kudos among the Palestinian Authority. Netanyahu says “nyet,” and the Palestinians and Israel are once again on a collision course.

All this is on the face of it.

I don’t believe any of it.

As in so much else, semantics play a seminal role. What is meant by a “Palestinian state”?

Guess what: What Netanyahu wants, and what Olmert wanted, are precisely the same. It’s just that Netanyahu doesn’t call it a state, and Olmert did.

I won’t deny that symbolism plays a major role in diplomacy; that Olmert’s symbolism elicited positive nods around the world, and that Netanyahu’s symbolism elicits the opposite.

But very quickly it will become clear to all parties — Obama, the EU, the PA, not to mention Israel — that nobody really wants a Palestinian state, not now, anyway.

Here’s what Olmert said: Yes, the Palestinians must have their own state. There must be a “two-state” solution.

But if this were really true, then why isn’t there a Palestinian state? Olmert had plenty of time to negotiate one. And he didn’t. This is why:

He said that a Palestinian state must give the Palestinians control over their own destiny, except to the extent it it could destabilize or destroy Israel.

Therefore, Olmert said, a Palestinian state cannot control its own airspace, cannot have an army, cannot make a defense pact with another country, cannot make treaties and cannot take over Jerusalem.

Netanyahu says: That’s not a state.

The Palestinian negotiators say: That’s not a state we want.

Which is why Olmert never consummated negotiations over a Palestinian state.

The truth is, the Palestinians don’t want a state, either, not one that promotes peace, anyway.

They say they want a full state, control over their own air space, the right to make defense pacts, etc. Translation: They want a state that’s free to try to destroy Israel, free to continue terrorist attacks, free to deny the existence of Israel as a Jewish state.

Which means, they really don’t want a two-state solution.

I won’t deny that Olmert played the West for a fool with his faithful allegiance to the concept of a Palestinian state, defined as something unacceptable to Palestinian negotiators.

Olmert also defined a “two-state solution” as a “shelf solution.” That is, his goal was to get Israel and the Palestinian Authority to agree on what a Palestinian state would look like. It would be a picture on a shelf — a state in theory.

Only as years passed would it be put into place, piece by piece.

A highly unrealistic scenario — but one that kept the US and the EU happy.

I won’t deny that Netanyahu’s approach lacks this PR appeal.

But Netanyahu tells it like it is, defines the real issues, and therefore has some chance of ultimate success.

Netanyahu is saying: Two states will not live side by side in peace when one of the states will not renounce terrorism and the Hamas charter.

Netanyahu is saying: Let’s be grown ups. Are we in favor of real peace, or some fig leaf called a “state” that actually is a “terrorist state”?

Netanyahu is saying something else, too: The motive to get the Palestinians past their penchant for violence is economic development. Netanyahu took the Israeli economy out of the doldrums in the early 2000s. He believes he can do the same for the Palestinian economy.

Whether Netanyahu will succeed, I don’t know. I do know that there is little difference between him, Olmert, Obama and the Palestinians on the issue of a Palestinian state, except semantics.

What Olmert called a state, Netanyahu doesn’t, and the Palestinians agree. Translation: Netanyahu didn’t backtrack. He spoke plainly.

Comments
Add New
+/-
Write comment
Name:
Email:
 
Title:
UBBCode:
[b] [i] [u] [url] [quote] [code] [img] 
 
 
Please input the anti-spam code that you can read in the image.

3.23 Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved."

Last Updated ( Wednesday, 08 April 2009 09:29 )  

JTA News

Is Austrian presidential challenger a Nazi sympathizer?

12 March 2010, 2:04 pm Austrian politics is roiling over the question of whether the lone challenger to Austria’s president in the upcoming election is a Nazi sympathizer.... [Link]

Israeli Embassy in New Zealand to reopen

12 March 2010, 1:41 pm Israel will open a new embassy in New Zealand next month amid signs of warming relations between Wellington and Jerusalem.... [Link]

Jewish Iranian family busted for drug smuggling

12 March 2010, 1:23 pm An Iranian Jewish family was arrested at Ben-Gurion Airport after trying to smuggle more than 30 pounds of opium into Israel.... [Link]

Israel seals off West Bank

12 March 2010, 1:11 pm Israel has sealed off the West Bank for 48 hours for fear of Arab rioting.... [Link]

Jewish groups upset with Presbyterians

11 March 2010, 8:39 pm Jewish groups are upset with recent actions by the Presbyterian church regarding its Israel policies.... [Link]

Foxman slams Israel on Jerusalem announcement

11 March 2010, 8:09 pm Israel's announcement of new housing starts during U.S. Vice President Joe Biden's visit was a "disaster," Abraham Foxman said in a rare rebuke.... [Link]

Clinton to address AIPAC

11 March 2010, 7:46 pm U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton will be the keynote speaker at the American Israel Public Affairs Committee annual policy conference.... [Link]

Irvine supporters question ‘Zionist’ influence

11 March 2010, 6:58 pm Supporters of 11 university students arrested for disrupting a campus speech expressed concern about "Zionist influence" on the disciplinary process.... [Link]

Shabbat Times

Weather

Denver
Increasing Clouds Friday: Increasing Clouds
57°F | 31°F
Mostly Cloudy Today: Mostly Cloudy
46°F | 30°F
Partly Sunny Tomorrow: Partly Sunny
51°F | 31°F
Current Conditions:
The most current observation is more than 8 hours old, please try again later.
Z Weather

Intermountain Jewish News • 1177 Grant Street • Denver, CO 80203 • 303 861 2234 • FAX 303 832 6942 • email@ijn.com