For those of us, Christians and non-Christians, who count themselves as friends of Catholics and their church, these have been a bad few weeks.
On Jan. 21, Pope Benedict XVI revoked the excommunication of four priests who, in 1988, were illegally ordained bishops by the late renegade archbishop Marcel Lefebvre. Those ordinations led to Pope John Paul II excommunicating Lefebvre and the four priests.
One of those four was Richard Williamson, who announced in an interview aired on Swedish television in November, 2008, and on Jan. 21, 2009 that “two hundred (thousand) to 300,000 Jews perished in Nazi concentration camps. None of them in a gas chamber.”
In the interview, Williamson also referred to the Holocaust as “the, quote unquote, Holocaust . . . ” He has long been a Holocaust denier.
As far back as 1989, he risked criminal prosecution in Canada, where he praised books written by Holocaust denier Ernst Zundel.
While empirically true, it is misleading to simply say, as many news reports have, that Pope Benedict repealed the excommunication of a Holocaust denier. It is highly unlikely that the pope, a German who has visited Auschwitz and spoken forcefully about the Shoah (the pope used the Hebrew term for the Holocaust), knew about Williamson’s Holocaust denial. The pope, in his fervent desire to end schisms within the church, decided, wisely or not, to reach out to one prominent schismatic group, Lefebvre’s Society of St. Pius X.
But it was obviously a mistake. Williamson is a truly bad man who disgraces the church. When one watches him spew his venom in the Swedish television interview while wearing a large cross, the cross is rendered ugly — just as the Muslim crescent is rendered ugly by Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad when he spews his Holocaust-denying venom.
What is perplexing is not that the pope or his top officials made a serious mistake by readmitting Williamson into the church. People make mistakes.
What is perplexing is that the moment Williamson’s big lie and Jew-hatred became known, the revocation of his excommunication was not halted or reversed. Rather, the Vatican demanded that he must “unequivocally and publicly distance himself from his positions on the Shoah.”
On the assumption that there not only theological but also moral criteria to being reinstated in the Catholic Church, an excommunicated priest who denies the Holocaust should automatically remain excommunicated. Would a priest who denied that Jesus was crucified have his excommunication rescinded?
People believe that Jesus was crucified despite the fact that we have so much more proof of the Holocaust than we do of Jesus’ crucifixion. Yet, here is a priest denying the Holocaust of Jesus’ people, as if those nearly six million European Jews all died of old age.
One would love to ask these Holocaust deniers one question: Poland had three million Jews in 1939 and almost none in 1945. Where did those three million Jews go?
A man who denies the Holocaust is either a liar on a magnitude difficult for most mortals to comprehend, or a manifestly sick human being for whom the difference between truth and lie is not discernible, or profoundly anti-Semitic.
Such a person shouldn’t be asked to “distance himself from his positions on the Shoah.” He should be shunned by the pope and by his church. If Williamson is ever to be a Catholic in good standing, he needs to repent from evil, not adopt another “position” on the Holocaust.
There are no “positions” on whether the Holocaust took place any more than there are “positions” on whether slavery took place or whether there was a French Revolution.
If he does repent, we will know. That repentance will take the form of doing work for the victims of the Holocaust that he once said never occurred.
Meantime, there should be no place for an Ahmadinejad in the Catholic Church.
| Comments |
|